Skip to main content

​
Is Monolex’s ACK-Based Rendering Control Unique?

After comprehensive investigation of 6 major terminal emulators and their source code, Monolex’s consumer-driven, rendering-based ACK flow control is architecturally unique.

​
Executive Summary

No other terminal implements rendering-completion-based ACK from frontend to backend. All existing flow control mechanisms fall into these categories:
  1. Producer-side pause/resume (xterm.js, node-pty)
  2. Time-based batching (Hyper)
  3. Watermark-based buffer limits (xterm.js proposal)
  4. Render-independent frame pacing (Kitty, Alacritty, Ghostty)
  5. Traditional XON/XOFF (software flow control)
Monolex’s approach is architecturally unique.

​
Terminal-by-Terminal Analysis

​
xterm.js (Web Terminal Standard)

Current Mechanism: 
// xterm.js recommended flow control
pty.on('data', (data) => {
  pty.pause();  // Pause PRODUCER
  term.write(data, () => {
    pty.resume();  // Resume after PARSING (not rendering!)
  });
});
Critical Gap:
“With websockets in between it gets more complicated - we have first to find a way to send the PAUSE/RESUME events through to the backend with low performance impact.”
Verdict: Producer-side control. Write callback fires after parsing, NOT after rendering. No rendering-based ACK.

​
Alacritty (GPU-Accelerated Rust)

Mechanism: 
PTY → VTE Parser → Grid State → OpenGL Renderer → Display
                                      ↑
                               No backpressure
Code Evidence: 
// resize.rs - synchronous operations, no flow control
pub fn resize(&mut self, cols: usize, rows: usize) {
    // Executes synchronously
    // No ACK or completion callback
}
Verdict: All frames rendered. 100 chunks = 100 GPU renders. No rendering-based ACK.

​
Ghostty (Native Zig, Metal/OpenGL)

Mechanism: 
// Ghostty RenderState
const RenderState = struct {
    dirty: enum { full, partial, false },
    // Dirty tracking exists
    // No feedback to IO thread
};
Gap Analysis:
  • IO thread receives bulk data rapidly
  • Renderer has 60fps budget
  • If render takes longer, IO thread continues (no backpressure)
  • Result: Visible frame tearing during high output
Verdict: Dirty tracking exists but no IO→Renderer feedback. No rendering-based ACK.

​
WezTerm (GPU, Rust)

  • PtyMux protocol for multiplexing
  • Flow control mentioned in protocol context
  • No rendering-to-producer feedback found
Verdict: Multiplexer flow control only. No rendering-based ACK.

​
Kitty (GPU Python/C)

repaint_delay: Artificial delay in render loop
input_delay: Delay for input processing
“Interaction with child programs takes place in a separate thread from rendering, to improve smoothness.”
Verdict: Thread separation for smoothness. No rendering-based ACK.

​
Hyper (Electron + xterm.js)

// Hyper's DataBatcher (PR #3336)
class DataBatcher {
  write(data) {
    this.buffer += data;
    if (this.buffer.length >= MAX_BATCH_SIZE) { // 200KB
      this.flush();
    }
  }
}
Verdict: Size-based batching (200KB). No rendering-based ACK.

​
Monolex’s Unique Approach

​
Consumer-Driven ACK Flow Control

// Backend: lib.rs
let mut has_pending_data = false;
let mut waiting_for_ack = false;
const ACK_TIMEOUT_SECS: u64 = 10;

loop {
    match rx.recv().await {
        Some(GridMessage::Data(data)) => {
            // ALWAYS parse - Grid state updated immediately
            let grid_update = renderer.process(&data);

            // CRITICAL: Skip emit if waiting for ACK
            if waiting_for_ack {
                has_pending_data = true;
                continue;  // ← Parser continues, emit skipped
            }

            // Emit and wait for ACK
            app.emit(&event_name, &grid_update);
            waiting_for_ack = true;
        }

        Some(GridMessage::Ack) => {
            waiting_for_ack = false;

            // Emit fresh snapshot if data arrived during wait
            if has_pending_data {
                has_pending_data = false;
                renderer.request_full_update();
                let grid_update = renderer.to_grid_update();
                app.emit(&event_name, &grid_update);
                waiting_for_ack = true;
            }
        }
    }
}
Frontend: 
// After handling GridUpdate
invoke("grid_ack", { sessionId }).catch(() => {});

​
Why This Is Unique

AspectOther TerminalsMonolex
Flow ControlProducer-drivenConsumer-driven
ACK TriggerParse completeRender complete
Feedback LoopPartial or noneComplete closed loop
Memory During WaitQueues growO(1) (boolean flag)
High Output UXJitter/crashStable

​
Architectural Comparison

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  OTHER TERMINALS (xterm.js, Alacritty, Ghostty)                 │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  PTY → Parse → [buffer?] → Render → Display                     │
│                    ↑                                            │
│                No feedback from render                          │
│                                                                 │
│  Result: Parser overwhelms renderer under high output           │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│  MONOLEX (ACK-Based Flow Control)                               │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│  PTY → Parse (always) → [ACK gate] → Emit → Render → Display    │
│                              ↑                        │         │
│                              │                        ↓         │
│                              └────── grid_ack() ──────┘         │
│                                                                 │
│  Result: Render controls emit rate, stable UI                   │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

​
Why Others Don’t Implement This

Terminal TypeReason for No ACK
xterm.jsWrite callback designed for parsing, not DOM updates
GPU TerminalsOptimized for input latency, not output stability
Electron/HyperIPC overhead concerns, xterm.js limitation
NativePerformance philosophy: render everything fast

​
Implications

​
For AI-Native Terminals

ACK-based flow control is essential for stable LLM streaming UX. Without it:

​
For Traditional Terminals

Fast rendering alone doesn’t solve high-output visual stability. The problem is architectural.

​
For xterm.js Ecosystem

Need new API for rendering-completion feedback: 
// Proposed
term.writeWithAck(data): Promise<void>
// Resolves when DOM/GPU update visible

​
References

​
GitHub Issues Analyzed

​
Documentation

“Consumer-driven backpressure is the missing piece in terminal architecture for AI-native workloads.”